Home Blog

ATP Year-End No. 1 Explained — The Race Decides It, and the Weekly No. 1 Can Be Someone Else

0

The ATP year-end No. 1 is the player who finishes the season at the top of the PIF ATP Rankings. The honor is presented at the Nitto ATP Finals, and the final rankings of the year are published the Monday after it; in 2025 they came out on 17 November. Through the autumn, though, the ATP points to a different table to show who is winning that race: the PIF ATP Live Race To Turin, which it calls the barometer for the year-end No. 1 battle.

That is why, in October 2026, Alexander Zverev can clinch year-end No. 1 in Shanghai while the ATP says he will not overtake Jannik Sinner in the weekly rankings when they are re-run after the tournament. Both statements are true, and the reason is the difference between the two tables.

Two tables, two time windows

The PIF ATP Rankings are the official world rankings, used for entry and seeding. They run on a rolling 52-week window: each week, the points a player earned at the same week’s events a year earlier come off, and whatever he earns now goes on. In singles a player’s total is built from 18 results plus the Nitto ATP Finals as a 19th: the four Grand Slams, the eight automatic-entry Masters 1000 events and his six best other results, which can include the United Cup, Monte-Carlo, ATP 500s, ATP 250s, Challengers and ITF events.

The Race uses the same points but counts only what has been earned in the current calendar year. It starts at zero in January and decides qualification for Turin: the top seven after the Paris Masters qualify, and the eighth place goes to a current-year Grand Slam champion ranked between eighth and 20th if there is one, according to the ATP.

Early in the season the two tables can look nothing alike, because the rankings still carry most of the previous year. By the time the rankings are run after the season finale, almost all of last year’s results have dropped out of the 52-week window, so the two tables converge. That is why the Race leader at the end of the season is, in practice, the year-end No. 1.

Why the weekly No. 1 and the year-end leader can differ

In October, a player’s ranking still includes his results from the closing weeks of the previous season, while the Race does not. A player who did well last autumn but has stopped playing keeps those points in the rankings until each week rolls round again.

That is the 2026 case. Sinner, who ended his season with a knee injury, is No. 1 in the weekly rankings, but Zverev leads the Race. The ATP has said that whatever happens in Shanghai, Zverev will not move above Sinner when the rankings are re-run after the event. As the remaining weeks of the 2025 calendar come off Sinner’s total and he adds nothing new, the weekly ranking moves toward the Race. Being No. 1 in the Live Rankings mid-week does not count either: the ATP says a player cannot call himself World No. 1 unless he spends at least one week at No. 1 in the published rankings.

How year-end No. 1 is clinched

A player clinches when no rival can catch him in the Race with the points left on the calendar. A Masters 1000 title is worth 1,000 points and an undefeated Nitto ATP Finals champion collects 1,500, so the sums usually stay open into the European indoor season.

The clinch can come from a player’s own result or from rivals losing. In Shanghai in 2026, the ATP set out two routes for Zverev: reach the semifinals, or see Carlos Alcaraz and Ben Shelton both lose at any point in the event. In 2025 it went to the last week. Alcaraz and Sinner arrived in Turin still contesting it, and Alcaraz clinched on 13 November by beating Lorenzo Musetti to go 3-0 in the round robin.

Players have rearranged whole autumns for it. Chasing a sixth straight year-end No. 1 in 1998, Pete Sampras added Basel, Vienna, Lyon, Stuttgart, Paris and Stockholm to his schedule between the US Open and the season finale, according to the ATP. Marcelo Rios, his nearest challenger, did the same; Rios was then hurt at the finale in Hanover, and Sampras learned he had clinched while eating pasta at his hotel.

The records

Nineteen players have finished a season as ATP year-end No. 1 since the rankings began in 1973, ATP chairman Andrea Gaudenzi said in 2025. Novak Djokovic holds the record with eight, in 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2018, 2020, 2021 and 2023, and he owns the three oldest year-end No. 1 finishes, the last at 36. Sampras is second with six, and his six came in a row, from 1993 to 1998, a streak no one else has matched. Jimmy Connors, with five straight from 1974 to 1978, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal have five each.

At the other end, Alcaraz became the youngest year-end No. 1 in 2022, at 19, after starting that season at No. 32, the biggest rise to the year-end top spot in the rankings’ history. His second finish in 2025 put him alongside Bjorn Borg, Stefan Edberg and Lleyton Hewitt with two, and made him the 11th player to finish No. 1 more than once. Before Alcaraz, Hewitt was the youngest, clinching in 2001 at the finale. The full list of men who have held No. 1 at any point is in our ATP world No. 1 list.

Season Snapshot — 10 October 2026

Zverev leads the Race To Turin and has qualified for the Nitto ATP Finals (15-22 November), with Sinner second but out for the rest of 2026 and Alcaraz third, also qualified. Shelton is fourth and qualifies if he beats Arthur Gea in Shanghai. Zverev, the top seed in Shanghai, opened with a 6-4, 7-6 (4) win over Wu Yibing on Friday and plays Quentin Halys next. Sinner remains No. 1 in the weekly rankings. The current standings and qualification rules are in our Race to Turin guide.

This snapshot is dated and will change. The career record above does not.

Shnaider, Paolini and Eala Head the Hong Kong Entry List, and the Defending Champion Is Not on It

0

Four Top 20 players, Diana Shnaider, Sorana Cirstea, Alexandra Eala and Jasmine Paolini, head the entry list for the Prudential Hong Kong Tennis Open, the WTA said. The WTA 250 runs Nov. 2-8 on the outdoor hard courts at Victoria Park Tennis Stadium and is one of the last two tour events before the WTA Finals.

The name missing is last year’s champion. Victoria Mboko, who beat Cristina Bucsa in a three-set final in 2025, has not played since June and is not among the direct entrants. The WTA reported last month that she was still recovering from the left knee injury she suffered this summer.

The field. Behind the top four, the Top 50 entrants are Leylah Fernandez, Ann Li, Maria Sakkari, Bucsa, Talia Gibson, Wang Xinyu, Liudmila Samsonova, Kimberly Birrell, Yuliia Starodubtseva, Daria Snigur, Oleksandra Oliynykova and Anhelina Kalinina. The last seven direct entries are Mayar Sherif, Zheng Qinwen, Katie Boulter, Sonay Kartal, Zeynep Sonmez, Paula Badosa and Anna Bondar.

The first five main-draw alternates are Tereza Valentova, Camila Osorio, Viktorija Golubic, Maria Timofeeva and Alina Korneeva. Any withdrawal from the 23 direct entrants brings the next of them in.

The draw. The singles draw has 32 places: the 23 direct entrants, four qualifiers, four wild cards and one special exempt. The top four seeds get first-round byes. The draw will be made on Saturday, Oct. 31, first-round play starts Monday, Nov. 2, and the singles and doubles finals are on Sunday, Nov. 8. The WTA 250 Chennai Open is played the same week.

The record. Two recent champions are back. Shnaider won the title in 2024, beating Boulter in the final, and Fernandez won it in 2023 and has reached the semifinals in each of the last two years. The tournament dates to 1980 and returned to the tour in 2014 after a 32-year absence broken only by a 1993 edition.

What it means. Hong Kong’s final falls on the same day the WTA Finals begin at Indian Wells, which makes this week and Chennai the regular season’s closing act. Zheng’s entry comes after her semifinal run in Beijing as a wild card. How the eight-woman Finals field is decided is in our WTA Finals qualification explainer, and the run of events that leads here is in our Asian swing explainer.

Andreeva Broke Bartunkova Five Times in Beijing and Will Be World No. 3 on Monday

0

Mirra Andreeva spent Saturday’s China Open semifinal on Nikola Bartunkova’s serve. She created 10 break points, converted five and was through 6-2, 6-2 in 74 minutes, into her first Beijing final.

The 19-year-old hit 16 winners against 10 unforced errors, according to the WTA. It is her fifth final of 2026, level with Elena Rybakina, Aryna Sabalenka and Jessica Pegula for the most on tour this year, and the win was her 50th of the season, tying Pegula for the lead. It will lift her to a career-high No. 3 in Monday’s rankings.

The return has been the project. Andreeva leads the tour in break points converted this year, 301 in main-draw matches, the WTA said, and she credited the practice court. “We’ve been working on returning a lot,” she said. “Every practice that I have we’re trying to improve everything, but also to work on return because I feel like even if the opponent serves well, you still have to try and put some pressure on the server. I feel like the work is paying off little by little.”

“I think I played very good today. I’m super happy with the way I was playing,” she said. “Of course, Nikola is a very tricky opponent. We had a tough match at the US Open.”

Bartunkova’s week. The 20-year-old Czech, seeded 26th, had beaten four-time Grand Slam champion Sabalenka in the round of 32 and then took the last seven games from Karolina Muchova to reach her first WTA 1000 semifinal. She will make her Top 30 debut after the tournament, Reuters reported. Her profile is here.

The final. Sunday’s opponent comes from the second semifinal, played later Saturday, between 13th seed Elise Mertens and wild card Zheng Qinwen. Mertens beat Coco Gauff for the first time in six meetings and then 2023 champion Iga Swiatek 7-6 (0), 6-3; Zheng beat sixth seed Elina Svitolina 6-3, 7-6 (6). Andreeva lost her only previous match against Zheng and leads Mertens 1-0.

“Elise has a different game style,” Andreeva said. “I feel like Qinwen, obviously she’s more aggressive, she likes to hit a lot of balls, she tries to play fast, whereas I think Elise kind of likes to play, build the point, kind of be smart, what to do.”

What it means. Andreeva has already qualified for the WTA Finals at Indian Wells, so Sunday is about a fourth title of the year rather than a place in the finale. The singles final is scheduled for not before 7 p.m. local time. There is no gap afterward: the Wuhan Open, the last WTA 1000 of 2026, starts Monday, and the WTA projects Andreeva as its third seed, with a first-round bye. How the Finals field is decided is in our WTA Finals qualification explainer.

Hurkacz Beat Djokovic at the Ninth Attempt, and Djokovic Says Paris Is His Only Stop Before Turin

0

Hubert Hurkacz had lost all eight of his previous matches against Novak Djokovic. On Friday night at the Qi Zhong Tennis Center he needed one break in each set, and 87 minutes, to win the ninth, 6-4, 6-3, in the second round of the Rolex Shanghai Masters.

The match was settled on the Hurkacz serve. He saved two break points to hold in the third game, according to the ATP Tour, and was largely in control from there, winning 82 percent of the points behind his first serve (36 of 44), per Infosys ATP Stats. Djokovic, who lifted his 102nd tour-level title in Beijing on Tuesday night, explained it in one sentence.

“If you lose your serve, it is enough to lose the match, once per set, and that is what happened,” Djokovic said. “It is very difficult to return his serve, almost impossible. So yeah, I did not adjust and it was a really tough draw for me, playing him in the first match.”

The ATP Tour reported that the 39-year-old appeared to struggle physically in his sixth match in 10 days. Hurkacz, who retired from his Beijing semifinal against Alex de Minaur with an adductor injury, came in fresher after beating James Duckworth in the first round with 19 aces.

“Definitely it was very important at the start to stay there with Novak, because if he gets ahead, he presents such a great level and it’s not easy to come back,” Hurkacz said. “Then towards the end of course I was feeling some nerves. It’s not my first time leading by a break in a set against Novak so I was trying to stay focused on my things, what I needed to do.”

The Pole. Hurkacz is playing Shanghai for the first time since he won the title in 2023 and has now won eight straight matches there. He reached the Chengdu final two weeks ago. According to the ATP Tour, he is now the fourth player with at least one hard-court win over each of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Djokovic, after Andy Murray, Dominic Thiem and Alexander Zverev. His third-round opponent is Zhou Yi, the Chinese wild card ranked No. 277, who beat 24th seed Lorenzo Musetti 7-6 (7), 3-6, 7-6 (1) on Friday.

The schedule. “Beijing was great and a very early exit here but it is ok,” Djokovic said. “I had a great week in Beijing and I look forward to resting a little bit and get ready for the indoors.” On the season finale, he was direct: “I would like to [play the Nitto ATP Finals]. I am planning on only playing in Paris, so let’s see. Hopefully I can have a good result there.”

The ATP lists the Rolex Paris Masters in November as his next scheduled event. Djokovic is 19-7 this season, according to the Infosys ATP Win/Loss Index, with the Beijing title and a run to the Australian Open final, where he beat Jannik Sinner in the semifinals.

What it means for Turin. Djokovic is ninth in the PIF ATP Live Race To Turin, the ATP said after the match. The top seven in the Race after Paris qualify for the Nitto ATP Finals (15-22 November), and the eighth place goes to a current-year Grand Slam champion ranked between eighth and 20th if there is one. Zverev and Carlos Alcaraz are already in. Sinner, second in the Race, has ended his season with a right knee injury; how a withdrawal opens a place to the next man is set out in our ATP Finals alternates explainer.

The men around him did not stand still. Flavio Cobolli, fifth in the Race and needing the Shanghai title to qualify here, lost his opener 6-1, 4-6, 6-3 to Adrian Mannarino with 42 unforced errors. Ben Shelton, fourth, beat Daniel Altmaier 6-3, 7-6 (6) on his 24th birthday and seals his place in Turin if he beats Arthur Gea next. Daniil Medvedev, eighth, came from a set down to beat Jan-Lennard Struff on Saturday. Djokovic, by his own plan, has one tournament left to answer them. The full qualification picture is in our Race to Turin guide.

Alina Charaeva Profile — Armenia’s First Win Over a World No. 1

0

Alina Charaeva arrived at the 2026 China Open ranked No. 118, with two WTA 1000 main draws behind her and no match won at that level. Her second match of the fortnight was a win over the world No. 1. Her 3-6, 6-4, 6-3 second-round win over Elena Rybakina in Beijing was her first match against a Top 20 player, and according to the WTA it made her the first Armenian player to beat a world No. 1 since the rankings were first published in 1975.

The win was the headline of a breakthrough built slowly: two Roland Garros junior finals, years on the ITF circuit, a Tour-level debut that came only in 2025, and a change of national colours to Armenia in July 2026.

The Beijing run

Charaeva opened with a 5-7, 7-5, 6-2 win over Yuliia Starodubtseva that lasted three hours and 12 minutes, then took down Rybakina, the top seed, in two hours and 11 minutes. That result emptied the top of the draw before Aryna Sabalenka followed the next day. Charaeva then beat Sonay Kartal 6-4, 6-1 to reach the fourth round, where she was trying to become the first Armenian player to reach a WTA 1000 quarterfinal.

She lost that match to home wild card Zheng Qinwen, 6-1, 2-6, 6-4, according to the official draw. It was a rematch six years in the making. In the only previous meeting, Zheng beat Charaeva 4-6, 6-4, 6-4 in the final of a W25 event in Marbella in 2020, on clay, when both were ranked outside the Top 600, WTA match notes show.

Before Beijing, her two WTA 1000 appearances had both come through qualifying in 2026 and both ended in the first round: against Janice Tjen in Madrid and against Nikola Bartunkova in Cincinnati.

Junior finals and the ITF years

Charaeva was born on May 27, 2002, and plays right-handed. She reached the Roland Garros girls’ doubles final in 2019 with Tikhonova and the girls’ singles final in 2020, losing to Elsa Jacquemot, according to the WTA.

Her professional record runs through the ITF circuit. She won her first ITF singles title at a $15,000 event in Vinaros in 2018, played her first WTA qualifying in St. Petersburg in 2021 and won her second ITF title the same year, then added two ITF titles in 2022 and two more in 2023. In 2024 she won a W50 event in Ourense and broke into the Top 200 for the first time, at No. 199 on October 28. Her year-end rankings trace the climb: No. 492 in 2023, No. 234 in 2024, No. 161 in 2025.

Reaching the tour

Charaeva made her Tour-level debut as a qualifier at the WTA 500 in Tokyo in 2025, losing in the first round to Jaqueline Cristian, and also played the main draw in Chennai that season. She reached a WTA 125 final in Huzhou and rose to a then career-high No. 142 in September 2025.

The 2026 season brought her first two Tour-level quarterfinals: in Hamburg, where she lost to eventual runner-up Anna Bondar, and in São Paulo, where she lost to Anna Blinkova. São Paulo is her best hard-court result outside Beijing. She also reached the doubles final in Iasi with Kulambayeva and climbed to a career-high No. 108 in August.

Off court

Charaeva has represented Armenia since July 2026, according to the WTA. She trains in Barcelona and is coached by Pere Riba. Her parents encouraged her to play several sports as a child, table tennis among them, and her tennis idol is Roger Federer.

Grand Slam best results

  • Australian Open: no main-draw appearance
  • Roland Garros: no main-draw appearance (girls’ singles runner-up 2020; girls’ doubles runner-up 2019)
  • Wimbledon: no main-draw appearance
  • US Open: no main-draw appearance

WTA match notes list her career Grand Slam main-draw record as 0-0 as of the 2026 China Open.

Season Snapshot — as of October 9, 2026

  • Ranking entering the China Open: No. 118 (career high No. 108, August 2026)
  • Best 2026 results: China Open fourth round (d. No. 1 Rybakina); quarterfinals at Hamburg and São Paulo
  • 2026 doubles: runner-up at Iasi (with Kulambayeva)
  • Coach: Pere Riba
  • Nation: Armenia (since July 2026)

This snapshot is dated and will change. The career record above does not.

WTA Prize Money Withdrawals Explained — The Late On-Site Pull-Out That Avoids a Fine

0

When Coco Gauff withdrew from the Wuhan Open this week, her announcement came with a quotation about needing rest. That was not only good manners. The WTA’s 2026 Official Rulebook requires a withdrawing player to give a reason and a quotation the WTA can release, and it fines her if she does not. The same rulebook sets out what a late withdrawal costs and the few ways around the fine. One of them, the Prize Money Withdrawal, is the least understood. This explainer covers how it works and how it differs from the other options.

The default: a late withdrawal fine

A singles withdrawal counts as a Late Withdrawal once the player has been accepted into the main draw. The automatic fine depends on her ranking at the entry deadline and the level of the event. At a WTA 1000 it is $20,000 for a top-10 player, $10,000 for a player ranked 11 to 25, $5,000 for 26 to 50 and $2,500 below that. At a WTA 500 the scale runs from $7,500 down to $2,500, and at a WTA 250 from $5,000 down to $1,000.

Fines double with each further offence in the same tournament category, with some exceptions. Fines on top-10 players are split evenly between the WTA and the tournament; the WTA keeps the rest. A player who stays on the list, does not withdraw and fails to turn up for her first match commits a No-Show Offense, and the fine is 50 per cent higher than the late withdrawal fine. GTN’s guide to withdrawal rules in professional tennis covers the wider picture across both tours.

Option one: the Excused Withdrawal

Up to three times in a Tour Year, a player may withdraw from singles at a WTA tournament without a late withdrawal fine, provided the WTA receives her official withdrawal before her first match, qualifying or main draw. Doubles has its own allowance of three. A player is expected to use her best efforts to withdraw at least 12 hours before her first match; if she uses an Excused Withdrawal inside that window, the WTA may fine her anyway, and the withdrawal then does not count as excused. Excused Withdrawals cannot be used at the WTA Finals, and they do not cancel a zero-point ranking result where one applies. That zero is explained in GTN’s guide to WTA mandatory events.

Option two: the Prize Money Withdrawal

The Prize Money Withdrawal is built for the player who is already at the tournament and decides late that she cannot play. Up to twice in a Tour Year, a player who is on site may withdraw from singles without a late withdrawal fine, as long as the WTA receives her withdrawal inside a set window:

  • From qualifying: on or after the day of qualifying sign-in, but before her first qualifying match.
  • From a main draw at an event with qualifying: after qualifying has started, but before her first main draw match.
  • From a main draw at an event without qualifying: on or after the day the main draw starts, but before her first main draw match.

Her place goes to the next eligible lucky loser, or an alternate where that applies. The withdrawing player and the replacement are both paid under a formula in the rulebook’s prize money section, and lucky losers who come in this way are subject to deductions from first-round prize money. Doubles has its own Prize Money Withdrawal, also twice a year, for an on-site team that withdraws after the draw is made but before its first match.

The limits

The two allowances share a ceiling. A player’s Excused Withdrawals and Prize Money Withdrawals may total four in a Tour Year: three excused and one prize money, or two of each. The rulebook adds several conditions on the Prize Money Withdrawal:

  • It cannot be used at two consecutive WTA tournaments. The player must play a match at a tournament in between.
  • It cannot be used at the WTA Finals.
  • Except at her first tournament of the year, a player who has not competed at a WTA tournament, Grand Slam, ITF professional event, Billie Jean King Cup tie or Olympic event in the 60 days up to and including qualifying sign-in day cannot use one.
  • A player who uses one and then plays any other event in the same week, from a WTA tournament or Grand Slam to an exhibition, must pay a fine of double the prize money she received for the withdrawal.
  • It does not avoid a zero-point ranking result where one applies.
  • For a player using a special ranking, the tournament counts as one of her special-ranking events. For a player subject to the WTA’s Age Eligibility Rule, it counts as one of the events she is allowed to play.

Option three: the Consecutive Withdrawal

A player who withdraws from a tournament because of a medical illness or a musculoskeletal injury that warrants medical evaluation or treatment, which the rulebook calls a Medical Condition, can also withdraw from the following tournaments she has entered without using another allowance or paying another late fine.

The timing rules are strict. At tournaments with no qualifying she must withdraw before the main draw is made, and elsewhere she must generally withdraw before qualifying starts; at a multi-week WTA 1000, a player who is on site has until the start of her first match. If the first withdrawal was off site, she must see an accredited physician and, within 10 days, submit a WTA Medical Information Form completed by that physician, with the clinical records, and provide a quotation the WTA may release. While the run of consecutive withdrawals lasts, she cannot play any WTA, Grand Slam, ITF, Billie Jean King Cup, Olympic or exhibition event.

What every withdrawing player owes

Whatever route a player uses, the paperwork is the same. She must give a statement with the reason for her withdrawal and a quotation the WTA may release to the media. Failing to do so strips the withdrawal of its excused or prize money status, so the late withdrawal fine applies, and adds a further fine of $1,000 for a singles main draw withdrawal at tour level. A player who announces a withdrawal publicly before submitting it officially is fined under the Code of Conduct.

A player who withdraws on site must also be assessed by the WTA’s on-site medical provider (the PHCP, in the rulebook’s terms) and the tournament physician before she leaves the city, and within 24 hours she must take part in one post-withdrawal activity of up to an hour, such as a sponsor visit, an autograph session or a kids’ clinic. If she skips these, the withdrawal loses its excused or prize money status, the late withdrawal fine applies and an extra fine is added, from $5,000 for a top-10 player down to $250 for a player ranked 101 or below. For retirements during a match, see GTN’s explainer on walkovers, retirements and defaults.

Season Snapshot: October 2026

Updated 8 October 2026. The figures and rules above are from the WTA Official Rulebook dated 27 July 2026. The WTA has not said which allowance, if any, applied to the Wuhan withdrawals of Gauff and Naomi Osaka announced on 7 October. The ATP runs its own withdrawal rules, which differ in detail. This snapshot is dated and will change. The rules above do not, until the WTA amends them.

Tennis Order of Play Explained — The Supervisor Has the Final Say and No Match Should Start After 11 p.m.

0

Karolina Muchova needed nine match points and two hours and 52 minutes to beat Naomi Osaka 7-5, 1-6, 7-6 (7) in a late-night fourth-round match at the China Open this week. When a match like that starts, and on which court, was decided the day before, by a small group of people working to a written set of rules.

Here is who builds a tournament’s daily order of play, what its wording means, and the tour rule that is meant to stop matches starting near midnight.

Who writes the order of play

At ATP events, scheduling runs through a scheduling committee. The ATP Supervisor chairs it and makes the final decision on any scheduling matter the committee cannot agree on. The Supervisor is also responsible for making sure the daily order of play is posted on the official bulletin board and at the official hotel. The ATP Tour Manager sits on the committee as the players’ representative, and the tournament Referee is available to serve on it and assists the Supervisor.

The groundwork is laid months earlier. Each ATP tournament must send the ATP a match schedule plan, including proposed daily starting times and the number of courts it will use, at least 180 days before the event starts, and the plan needs the ATP’s written approval. WTA events work under the WTA’s own rules with WTA supervisors on site; the Beijing draw sheets this fortnight list four of them. More on the people who run a match is in our tennis officials explainer.

How to read one

An order of play lists each court with its first match under a fixed time, such as “Starting at 11:00 AM” on the China Open sheets, and every match after it as “Followed by”. A “followed by” match has no clock time: it begins when the match before it ends, which is why the third match on a court can start in mid-afternoon one day and after dark the next.

A “not before” time sets the earliest a match may start. At the United Cup, for example, organisers may assign “not before” times in consultation with the ATP Supervisor. The Supervisor also designates the tournament’s official clock and decides where and when matches are called.

When a match moves

The order of play is not fixed once printed. Under ATP rules, the Supervisor decides whether a court is fit for play and may move a match to another court, indoors or outdoors and regardless of surface, if that is needed to stop a player having to play two singles matches in one day or to finish the event. The Supervisor can also suspend or postpone play when weather or other conditions threaten safety. Rain has its own procedures, covered in our rain delay explainer.

The 11 p.m. rule

In January 2024 the ATP and WTA announced joint scheduling rules for their events, saying the number of matches finishing after midnight had risen considerably and was tied to an increase in average match length. The rules were:

  • No more than five matches per court per day, with an 11 a.m. start: three in the day session and two in the evening session.
  • No match to go on court after 11 p.m. unless approved by the ATP or WTA Supervisor in consultation with tour management.
  • A match not on court by 10:30 p.m. is moved to another court, no later than 11 p.m.
  • Night sessions to begin no later than 7:30 p.m., with 6:30 p.m. recommended.

Tournaments may ask for waivers based on local cultural traditions, weather or other extenuating circumstances. The rules were introduced as a one-year trial in 2024, with further review to follow.

The concern about midnight finishes had a recent precedent. At the 2023 Australian Open, Andy Murray’s match against Thanasi Kokkinakis ended at 4:05 a.m.

The Grand Slams set their own

The tour rules apply to ATP and WTA events, not to the four majors, which have their own scheduling rules. The Australian Open took a different route, moving to a Sunday start and a 15-day event from 2024 to spread out the early rounds. The Slams’ evening programmes are covered in our Australian Open night sessions and US Open night sessions explainers.

What no schedule controls

An order of play can cap the number of matches on a court and stop a late start; it cannot shorten a match. A two-hour-52-minute fourth round still pushes everything after it back, and a “followed by” match waits for it. The time between points is a separate rulebook question, covered in our shot clock explainer.

ATP Finals Alternates Explained — How a Withdrawal Opens Turin to the Next Man on the List

0

When Jannik Sinner ended his 2026 season on October 6 with a knee injury, he ruled himself out of the ATP Finals in Turin, the event he had won in each of the previous two years, Reuters and AFP reported. At the time he was second in the ATP’s Live Race To Turin, 800 points behind Alexander Zverev, according to the ATP Tour.

His absence does not leave a hole in the eight-man field. The ATP Rulebook decides who fills it, and the same rules guarantee a spare player on site in case anyone else drops out once the tournament has started. Here is how it works.

How the selection list is built

Qualification for Turin is not decided by a single cut-off number. The rulebook builds an ordered selection list on the Monday after the last ATP Tour tournament of the calendar year: first the top seven players in the ATP Rankings, then up to two Grand Slam champions of that year who are ranked between eighth and 20th, then everyone else from eighth place down.

The top eight names on that list are the direct acceptances. Participation is mandatory for them, and all must be at the site for the official pre-tournament media conference and available through the end of the round robin and the knockout rounds if they advance. During the season the ATP tracks the running count as the Race To Turin; how those points are counted is a separate question from what happens once the list is drawn up. [UNVERIFIED: rule text taken from the ATP’s 2023 Rulebook, chapter 4 (October 2023 edition); the 2026 edition was not checked for changes]

Withdrawal before the tournament

A player who withdraws before the official pre-tournament media conference starts is replaced by the next highest player on the selection list, and that player becomes a direct acceptance in his own right. In practice, a qualifier who is out before the event begins moves the ninth player into the field rather than calling up an alternate.

The alternate

Once the field is set, the next highest player on the list who is not a direct acceptance at the time of the media conference is designated as the alternate. He must attend the media conference and stay available until the start of the last scheduled round-robin match. If a player withdraws after that point, the alternate takes his place. The ATP may also select additional alternates from the list, on terms it agrees with them, and those extra alternates are not obliged to take part.

What an alternate can earn

The rulebook sets out three cases. An alternate who never plays is paid a fee. An alternate inserted for a player’s second or third round-robin match receives that fee plus any prize money and ranking points he wins. An alternate who replaces a player before that player’s first round-robin match becomes a direct acceptance and does not receive the alternate fee. The rulebook does not state the size of the fee.

An alternate is also eligible for the semifinals and final, with the points and prize money that come with them, if he qualifies from the group. That is harder than it sounds. The first tiebreaker in a group is the number of wins, and the second is the number of matches played, so a 2-1 record beats 2-0. An alternate who comes in for the last two group matches and wins both can still be edged out by a player who went 2-1.

Withdrawing during the round robin

A player who withdraws from any round-robin match after the first round is not eligible for the knockout stage. For the group tiebreakers, a retirement or conduct default counts as a straight-set result, but the games from that match are left out of the games-won percentage. A player who retires through illness or injury may continue in the event if the tournament doctor approves.

Not turning up

A direct acceptance or designated alternate who fails or refuses to play, without a bona fide injury or other good cause, is not in good standing with the ATP. Failing to appear at the site and the pre-tournament media conference carries a penalty of five per cent of the player’s total ATP prize money for the year.

The Grand Slam champion clause

The second step of the selection list exists for one scenario: a major champion who has slipped out of the top seven but is still inside the Top 20. In 2026 the majors went to Carlos Alcaraz at the Australian Open, Zverev at Roland Garros and the US Open, and Sinner at Wimbledon, according to AP and Reuters. The clause only changes the field if one of them finishes between eighth and 20th; a champion who is in the top seven takes his place through the first step, and a champion who withdraws is replaced like anyone else. The last ATP Masters 1000 of the year, the Rolex Paris Masters, runs from November 2 to 8.

On the women’s side

The WTA Finals, held at Indian Wells this year, also carries alternates under the WTA’s own rules. Ekaterina Alexandrova played a round-robin match at the 2025 WTA Finals as an alternate and lost to Elena Rybakina, the eventual champion, according to WTA match notes. The women’s qualification rules are covered in our WTA Finals qualification explainer, and both season finales in the ATP Finals and WTA Finals guide.

Bartunkova Took the Last Seven Games From Muchova and Now Plays Andreeva for a Place in the Beijing Final

0

Nikola Bartunkova was 5-0 up on Karolina Muchova before the seventh seed had a game on the board, and when Muchova finally clawed three back, the 20-year-old Czech simply started again. Bartunkova won 6-3, 6-0 on Thursday to reach her first WTA 1000 semifinal at the China Open, taking the last seven games and closing it when Muchova sent a ball long.

The opening burst took 19 minutes, and the second set followed the same script: another five-game lead, no way back for Muchova, who had needed nine match points to get past Naomi Osaka two days earlier. “Honestly I don’t know. It was (an) unbelievable match,” Bartunkova said on court. “She’s a great player and also a great human being.” She called the win a dream come true.

The run. It is the third win over a Top 10 player of Bartunkova’s career, and all three have come this year: No. 10 Belinda Bencic at the Australian Open, No. 2 Aryna Sabalenka 6-4, 6-3 in the third round here and now Muchova. On the way she also beat Magdalena Frech 6-2, 6-2 and Sinja Kraus 6-0, 4-6, 6-3. This is only her fourth WTA 1000 main draw.

Her previous best at the level was the fourth round in Rome in May, as a lucky loser. She began 2026 in qualifying at the Australian Open, and this time last year she was ranked No. 144; she arrived in Beijing at a career-high No. 34.

The semifinal. Saturday’s opponent is Mirra Andreeva, who finally got past Ekaterina Alexandrova at the third attempt, 7-6 (4), 7-6 (3). The Roland Garros champion dropped just three points in racing to a two-game lead and still needed a tiebreak to close the first set. Alexandrova had beaten her in straight sets on clay in Stuttgart in 2025 and on grass in Bad Homburg in June. “She played unbelievable today, and I’m very happy to get my very first win against her,” Andreeva said.

At 19, Andreeva is the youngest Beijing semifinalist since Agnes Szavay in 2007. It is her fourth WTA 1000 semifinal. She has won three titles this year, including Roland Garros, and is chasing a fourth.

The other half. Zheng Qinwen, a wild card ranked No. 54, beat sixth seed Elina Svitolina 6-3, 7-6 (6) on Friday for her first straight-sets win of the week. She double-faulted on the first point and trailed 0-2 before winning the opener, and fell on her back after converting her second match point in the tiebreak.

“Truthfully, because I really wanted to grab this win, I was really nervous,” Zheng told the crowd. “I played really aggressive in important moments.” It is her second Beijing semifinal after 2024, and comes 15 months after elbow surgery in July 2025, after which she played only one more event that season.

Zheng will play the winner of Friday night’s last quarterfinal, between 2023 champion Iga Swiatek and Elise Mertens. Swiatek leads that head-to-head 2-0 without dropping a set; Mertens arrived having beaten Coco Gauff for the first time in six meetings.

What it means. None of the top three seeds reached the last eight in Beijing — Elena Rybakina and Sabalenka went out in the first week and Gauff fell to Mertens — and the quarterfinals took two more contenders for the season finale with them. In mid-September, Svitolina and Muchova held the last two qualifying places in the Race to the WTA Finals, with Marta Kostyuk and Swiatek chasing. Both lost in the quarterfinals here; Swiatek is still playing. The WTA Finals is at Indian Wells this year. The Beijing final is Sunday, and the last WTA 1000 of the year, the Wuhan Open, starts the next day. How the Finals field is chosen is set out in our WTA Finals qualification explainer.

WTA 125 Explained — The Tier Below the Tour, Its Points and Who Is Allowed to Play

0

While the leading women play the Wuhan Open in the week of 12 October, three other WTA events are being played that week in Lisbon, Mallorca and Rovereto. They are WTA 125 tournaments, the level that sits between the ITF World Tennis Tour and the WTA’s tour-level events, the WTA 250, 500 and WTA 1000. This explainer covers what a 125 is worth, how players get in, and which players are kept out, using the WTA’s rankings guide and its 2026 Official Rulebook.

What a WTA 125 is worth

The champion of a WTA 125 earns 125 ranking points in singles and 125 in doubles, according to the WTA. That places the level just above the ITF’s top tier, the W100, whose champion earns 100 points, and half a WTA 250, whose champion earns 250. Points fall away round by round below that.

How much a 125 result can help depends on where it lands in a player’s ranking. Up to 18 tournaments count in a WTA singles ranking: the four Grand Slams, a player’s best six results at combined WTA 1000s, her best result at a non-combined WTA 1000, and her next best seven results from WTA 1000, 500, 250, 125 and ITF events, the WTA says. A 125 result competes for one of those last seven places. GTN’s WTA rankings explainer covers the rest of the system.

How players get in

The entry bar is low. A player needs a WTA singles ranking of 500 or better to enter a WTA 1000 or 500, and 750 or better for a WTA 250, but any WTA singles ranking at the entry deadline is enough to enter a WTA 125, according to the rulebook. Doubles works the same way: any WTA singles or doubles ranking will do.

Every WTA 125 has four regular singles wild cards and one doubles wild card. Qualifying draws of eight or 16 players get two wild cards, and draws of 24 or 32 get four. A player may receive up to three singles wild cards into WTA 125 events in a calendar year, and those are counted separately from her wild cards at tour level. A player ranked in the top 10 at the wild card deadline may not accept one.

Who is kept out

The rules on who may not play a 125 are what separate it from the tour. A player ranked in the top 10 at a 125’s entry deadline may not enter it, accept a wild card into it or compete in it, in singles or doubles. Below that, the restrictions depend on what else is on the calendar that week.

  • The same week as a WTA 1000. Any player who qualifies for main draw acceptance at the 1000 may not play the 125.
  • The second week of a WTA 1000 or a Grand Slam. Players ranked 21 and below may enter. Players ranked 11 to 20 may not enter, but up to two of them may play on wild cards. A player who was in the big event must also have lost in every draw she played there by the 125’s qualifying sign-in deadline.
  • The same week as a WTA 500 or 250. Players ranked 1 to 75 who qualify for main draw acceptance at that 500 or 250 may not play the 125.
  • A week with no tour-level event, or the off-season. Players ranked 1 to 50 at the entry deadline may not enter. Up to four players ranked 21 to 50 may play on WTA-approved wild cards. For these weeks, the 125 gets two extra wild card places, called WTA 125 Exemption Wild Cards, reserved for players in that ranking band.
  • The week of the WTA Finals. Players who qualify for the Finals, including the two confirmed alternates, may not play a 125 that week even if they withdraw from the Finals.

Who plays them

The level has grown quickly. The WTA said in 2025 that more than 50 WTA 125 tournaments were scheduled that year, more than double the number of just over three years earlier, with 24 events in the 2022 season. The 2025 events were spread across more than 20 countries on five continents and all three surfaces, some of them combined with ATP events, and carried more than $6 million in prize money, a record for the level, according to the WTA.

“The growth of the WTA 125 Circuit exemplifies the massive appeal and interest we are seeing in women’s tennis,” Portia Archer, the WTA’s chief executive, said in that 2025 announcement.

The fields mix players climbing from the ITF circuit with established players looking for matches. Naomi Osaka won her first clay-court title at the Saint-Malo 125 in 2025, according to the WTA. At the other end, 16-year-old Sun Xinran, the junior world No. 1 and US Open girls’ champion, had already played ITF and WTA 125 events before her tour-level debut as a wild card at the China Open last week, the WTA reported.

Some tournaments have used the level as a starting point. Rouen was a WTA 125 in 2022 and 2023 before it became a WTA 250 in 2024, and Guadalajara was a 125 event in 2019 before it went on to stage 250, 500 and 1000 tournaments and the 2021 WTA Finals, according to the WTA.

Season Snapshot: autumn 2026

Updated 8 October 2026. The WTA’s 2026 WTA 125 calendar, dated 25 September, lists these events for the rest of the year. Week of 12 October: Lisbon (clay), Mallorca (clay) and Rovereto (indoor hard). Week of 26 October: Courmayeur (indoor hard), Curitiba (clay) and Queretaro (clay). Week of 2 November: Cali (clay) and Luanda (hard). Week of 9 November: Sopo (clay). Week of 16 November: Colina (clay). Week of 23 November: Buenos Aires (clay). Week of 30 November: Angers (indoor hard) and Quito (clay). Week of 14 December: Limoges (indoor hard). Dates can change; the WTA calendar is the reference. This snapshot is dated and will change. The rules above do not, until the WTA amends them.